User talk:Darksun/Archive 1
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
- Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
just read your comments about pedophilia. I can understand your feelings very well as it was me who pointed out that pedophiles had entered wikipedia to abuse it for their propaganda about harmlessness of child abuse. I once met a pedophile who handed me a leaflet with that kind of propaganda, that is how I know that the "childlove movement" exists. I discussed with that guy until he saw that his entire way of "argumentation" was utterly flawed and he started to cry. I have never been proud about making someone cry before. He told me he would start a therapy, and I hope he does. Cecropia helped me to clean the pedophilia related articles of propaganda. Unfortunately, at the German version people are not as cooperative although even the head of the German wikimedia association mentioned in a recent newspaper interview that pedophiles are a problem of wikipedia. After what users like Zanthalon and Moon_light_shadow wrote I am quite sure you are right in that they engage in crimes. Please do not allow them to succeed by leaving wikipedia as Lucky did. The pictures may be disgusting, they may however be helpful for healthy people to understand the danger of self-proclaimed "childlovers". Get-back-world-respect 11:23, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Heya; I saw that you put the "disputed" Template on the above, but I can't for the life of me see why - there's no discussion on the talk page, nor even within the edit summaries, and it was your first edit to the page. What was the reason?
James F. (talk) 22:14, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
International Labo(u)r Organization
I don't really care which spelling we use on "International Labo(u)r Organization", but your recent cut-and-paste move left all of the history at International Labor Organization and the article at International Labour Organization. Please use the "move" capability when moving articles. You left a lot of unnecessary work behind for some administrator. -- Jmabel 18:45, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
- I reverted your edits to the aboive ILO articles to stay within GFDL accordane. - Davodd 19:24, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
The Flemingsberg article is my introducing someone to wikipedia, please let us go through her english mistakes and wikipedia stuff before jumping in, ta :-)
Thanks for reverting my talk page. I timed out thrice trying to do so. [[User:Anárion|File:Anarion.png]] 13:19, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
hi i think the page shouldn't be deleted there is no mention of anti-Michaelmoore
Thank you for your contribution to one, or more, articles that are now organized under Data management.
Because of your previous intrest, you are recieving an invitation to become a founding member of the Data Management Wiki Committee.
The members, of course, will form and solidify the purpose, rules, officers, etc. but my idea (to kick things off) is to establish a group of us who will take responsiblity to see that the ideas of Data management are promoted and well represented in Wikipedia articles.
If you are willing to join the committee, please go to Category_talk:Data_management and indicate your acceptance of this invitation by placing your three tilde characters in the list.
KeyStroke 01:23, 2004 Sep 25 (UTC)
I remembered my account data yesterday. I've got about 20 edits, but most were under my IP and I'm waiting for them to fix that. Luigi30 19:50, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Yay! You voted on a VFD I did! Also, HS went crazy and banned me from every channel he has ops in. Mind bringing him to his senses (if he has any)? Luigi30 20:35, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Copyright violating image
I noticed the image you listed on WP:IFD today. As it violates your copyright, you can get it deleted immediately at Wikipedia:Request for immediate removal of copyright violation. Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 22:09, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)